If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Background: Constitutional Conversations: Roles and Norms

Learn about the roles and norms that are crucial to having constitutional conversations.

Roles

Before engaging in a “constitutional conversation,” it is important to make sure that everyone understands their role, and how they will be expected to participate. You, as a student, will be expected to:
  • Help establish the norms of a successful “constitutional conversation.”
  • Participate in the discussion, working as a team to ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to share.
  • Reflect on your own performance, noting helpful contributions and areas for improvement.
  • Reflect on your new understanding of constitutional texts.
Your teacher will be expected to: - Help establish the norms of a successful “constitutional conversation.” - Model the skills associated with the conversation throughout the class. - Observe and record the flow of the discussion and the credit earned by the students.

Norms and Non-negotiables

In addition to understanding their roles, all participants work together to create a list of norms—or guidelines for the conversation—that everyone then agrees to follow. Creating norms is a great first step in preparing for your constitutional conversation, and the norms you create together can even be used for all classroom activities throughout the year.
  • Practical Guidelines: Some norms will be more practical, meant to better facilitate the conversation in your classroom. An example of this could be that everyone must speak once before anyone can speak twice.
  • Non-Negotiable Habits: Other norms will be non-negotiable. We call that a rule. These are essential habits needed to build effective discussions and learning in any classroom. For example, at the National Constitution Center, we choose to always focus on a constitutional question, examining what the government may do and what it may not do.

Want to join the conversation?