If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Jill Lepore on the Founders’ Vision for Article V and the Difficulty of Amending the Constitution

Please note this is a rough cut video as Khan Academy and the National Constitution Center work with educators on piloting the new Constitution 101 course. The full course will be available September 2024. Learn more here: https://blog.khanacademy.org/educators-find-out-the-latest-on-our-new-constitution-101-course-coming-september-2024/. Created by National Constitution Center.

Want to join the conversation?

  • male robot donald style avatar for user LM
    wow were really stuck in a system arent we? even if you wanted to make a law to change something for a reason, you have to go through so much approval and people to do it. i doubt it "should" be that hard. like, of course nobody can do it willy nilly, but they have be very concrete about it. now yes, we've deffinetly improved over 1000+ years, and yet a lot of laws/rules havent really done very much. i feel like they wanted this hard because they sorta wanna be on top enough to not hear all of our voices and still say no to the ones they do hear. i mean forget all the little basic rules, if we put it in another perspective the loooong complicated rules that we have to remember. its those im worried about, and i dont think that theres NEARLY enough openminded people to take charge of these type of things. like "oh no, lets slow down on making all these plastic bottles for our overconsuming profit and lets "focus" on planting more trees than we cut down. or "instead on making bottled pills, we give natural medicine like tinkchered" -(idk how to spell that)- "dandelions from your back yard." THOSE kind of problems.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript